Tulipanska Groznica 2017
▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▣▷ ♦▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣▢▣국가: 터키년: 2015시간: 103 분장르: 코미디, 판타지, 로맨스, 공상 과학프로듀서: 부락 악삭스크립트 작가: Burak Aksak배우: Hande Dogandemir, Fatih Artman, Cengiz BozkurtBana Masal Anlatma는 Hande Dogandemir, Fatih Artman 및 Cengiz Bozkurt가 출연 한 영화입니다.
”Everything he sees speaks tulip to him. Comely women are tulips; their skirts are petals, swinging around the pollen-dusted stigmas of their legs.”Amsterdam in the 1630s was considered one of the richest cities in the world.
Trade had been very good for the Dutch. Citizens were becoming very civilized with a growing interest in music and a need for art hanging in their homes. The painters of the city were kept busy with commissions as wealthy people not only wanted fine paintings on their ”Everything he sees speaks tulip to him. Comely women are tulips; their skirts are petals, swinging around the pollen-dusted stigmas of their legs.”Amsterdam in the 1630s was considered one of the richest cities in the world. Trade had been very good for the Dutch. Citizens were becoming very civilized with a growing interest in music and a need for art hanging in their homes. The painters of the city were kept busy with commissions as wealthy people not only wanted fine paintings on their walls, but also wished to immortalize themselves on canvas as well.
Tulipmania is in full blossom as speculators buy and sell bulbs for ridiculous amounts of money. Oxen, houses, special favors are exchanged for a few delicate globes.It was a mania, verging on hysteria. Men were wagering fortunes on one bulb’s ascendency. People were making so much money that those of a more conservative nature were starting to feel stupid for not being in on the game. Of course, what goes up, as they say, must come down.Living against this backdrop of wild speculation and feverish conjecture is Cornelis Sandvoort. He is a man of above average means and in some circles would even be considered to be wealthy. He collects art.
He invests in ships. His most recent acquisition is the lovely Sophia. She is much too young for him, but her family was impoverished. Cornelis is not only generous to her family, but also kind. He lost his first wife and his two boys. He wants a son so that this modest empire he is building will continue long after he is gone.Though past his prime, the tender flesh of the beautiful Sophia is all the Viagra he needs.”For three years we have been married and I have not produced a child. This is not through lack of trying.
My husband is still a vigorous man in this respect. At night he mounts me; he spreads my legs and I lie there like an upturned beetle pressed down by a shoe.”A vivid description to be sure. The passion is all one sided. During this act Sophia tries to keep her nose turned away so that his dreadful breath will not cause her to gag. She is too young yet to know that a moan here and a wiggle there will shorten the duration of Cornelis’s assault.Cornelis is proud of Sophia and decides that a family portrait is in order.
He can afford it after all. As her beauty fades it will still be trapped in the paint laid by the artist’s hands. Did someone mentioned laid?The painter Jan Van Loos has a mop of unruly hair and symmetrical features.
Most importantly he is young, and Sophia felt the biological groin tug of desire. There is no need to speculate about whether she will doink the painter. It is more of a question of when.Cornelis is a trusting man. It never crosses his mind that his bride might seek pleasure in the arms of a mere painter. After all, he saved her and her whole family from starving to death.
Even if she can’t love him, she should at least be grateful.As the plot spins forward, Deborah Moggach does add some interesting twists. The story certainly carries a moral point. Sophia’s actionS affect more than just herself. Besides the embarrassment for her husband, her decisions fling a wider net than she could even anticipate. Throw a rock in a pond, and watch the ripples slowly undulate from shore to shore. It is hard to anticipate the full extent of our actions, especially when we break promises, start to lie, recruit co-conspirators, and play the tulip lottery in the hopes of scoring big.What could possibly go wrong?Tulips are fascinating.
In the 1630s, they didn’t know that the most beautiful specimens are actually the result of a viral disease. They are spectacular mutations that fill our eyes with vibrant colors and fanciful ornate markings. Sophia, as beautiful as the most rare tulip, takes the chance that spring will always be in season and winter will never have the chance to make her lose her petals.Burning Heart Tulip, so apt for our young Sophia.I watched the 2017 movie starring Alicia Vikander, Christoph Waltz, Holliday Grainger, and Judi Dench along with a host of other talented actors and actresses. The movie was fantastic, but watching my wife putting a hand up to her mouth in alarm, gasping at other points, completely caught up in the plot of the movie made the movie even better for me. I was most struck by the fact that this story makes the reader/watcher care about each of the characters. We want them all to find happiness.
Each is a victim of circumstances, and these tribulations look impossible to overcome.You can see my movie and book reviews on my blog at. Sophia's painting hangs in the Rijksmuseum.
Others of her, with different titles and different painters, hang in the Dresden museum. Scholars quarrel about her identity. Is she Venus, is she Delilah?Like the scales of a precious tulip bulb, Sophia's life story is peeled away by the people who knew her the most intimate. Her husband, Cornelius Sandvoort, her maid Maria, the fish seller, Willem and the painter Jan van Loos.During the tulipmania of the 1600 in Holland, when greedy mongers gambled Sophia's painting hangs in the Rijksmuseum.
Others of her, with different titles and different painters, hang in the Dresden museum. Scholars quarrel about her identity. Is she Venus, is she Delilah?Like the scales of a precious tulip bulb, Sophia's life story is peeled away by the people who knew her the most intimate. Her husband, Cornelius Sandvoort, her maid Maria, the fish seller, Willem and the painter Jan van Loos.During the tulipmania of the 1600 in Holland, when greedy mongers gambled and lost fortunes, a beautiful girl falls victim to ambition, desire, and dreams, leading to grand deception, heartbreak and tragedy.This is the story of tulips and art and human failures. Through the eyes of history, religion and international commerce, a colorful collage of emotions and actions fill up the broad canvas. Deftly concealed to the naked eye, disguised below the rich textures and the bold actions of the painter, hides a somber undertone of mystery. And long after the girl is gone, her painting still mesmerizes scholars and public alike.And somewhere in the future, an author will come along and, through imaginative prose, as rich in color as the paintings, will try and explain Sophia to the world who lived through the boom-and-bust of tulipmania.A great read!RECOMMENDEDPS.
The Signature of All Things by Elizabeth Gilbert, will be a great complimentary read to this one. Real Rating: 2.5. of fiveOh forevermore. Always an older man whose beautiful young wife is misunderstood, uninterested, bored by him.and it's.his. fault. Then she meets a.handsome.young.artist.
who unleashes her primal passions the way her old man can't, or won't, or doesn't want to.Oh poor poor little lady.::eyeroll::Then we get the filmed version with that human blancmange Dane DeHaan as the Struggling Artist. Why anyone would think that blah little boy was hot beggars my Real Rating: 2.5. of fiveOh forevermore. Always an older man whose beautiful young wife is misunderstood, uninterested, bored by him.and it's.his. fault. Then she meets a.handsome.young.artist. who unleashes her primal passions the way her old man can't, or won't, or doesn't want to.Oh poor poor little lady.::eyeroll::Then we get the filmed version with that human blancmange Dane DeHaan as the Struggling Artist.
Why anyone would think that blah little boy was hot beggars my imagination.So the book got exactly the film it deserved. A halfway decent story halfway to good in book or film, so be warned that you're using your eyeblinks for a pretty surface without a shred of substance. (As a side note, why is an English accent shorthand for 'foreigner' in all films regardless of nation where they're set?).
Update Feb, 2017I first read this 5 years ago for book club and enjoyed it at that time. I reread this month to dip back in before the movie based on it is released Feb 24. I enjoyed it the second time around as well, keying in on some different things perhaps than on the initial outing. I had completely forgotten the ending!
I especially like Moggach's use of the brief moral maxims, quotes and bible verses at the beginning of each short chapter. Each Update Feb, 2017I first read this 5 years ago for book club and enjoyed it at that time. I reread this month to dip back in before the movie based on it is released Feb 24. I enjoyed it the second time around as well, keying in on some different things perhaps than on the initial outing. I had completely forgotten the ending! I especially like Moggach's use of the brief moral maxims, quotes and bible verses at the beginning of each short chapter.
Each does the job of connecting the reader to the moral dilemmas of the characters as well as the culture of the times. It will be interesting to see how this plays out on film.I really enjoyed this book once it got going. It takes place in the early 1600's Holland during Tulip Mania, something I hadn't heard of before. In the early 1600's tulips were discovered by the Dutch in Turkey. The Dutch went crazy for them and started trading and speculating on the most highly prized bulbs.This is a morality tale that includes infidelity, true love, art, tulip speculation, children out of wedlock, etc! Plus, I felt it was educational as to the culture in Holland in the early 1600's.
I liked how the book was written, each short chapter starting with a 'moral maxim' or a quote about art relevant to the chapter. At times I felt where it was headed was predictable, but there were enough surprises to keep it interesting right to the end.This is an interesting review and it appears that a movie based on the book has been an on-again-off-again project since the early 2000's. At one point Jude Law and Keira Knightly were slated to star. Still has not been made, however. I think it would make a good movie.This book was a selection from the Literature in Art program at our local art museum, MIA, in Minneapolis. I would not have read this book otherwise, I think, and the tour of selected works of art from that period enhanced my enjoyment of both the book and the art. This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers.
To view it,My husband is Dutch, I've heard of the tulip-mania that hit Holland, I like historical fiction - all the arrows were pointing to a book with possibility. Think instead of Boy meets Girl, Girl happens to be married to kindly older man, Boy and Girl fall into instant lust, Girl horribly betrays kindly husband, Boy behaves foolishly in every manner possible and on and on until we have a 17th century soap opera in full bloom (haha). Tulips do figure in, but just enough to set the My husband is Dutch, I've heard of the tulip-mania that hit Holland, I like historical fiction - all the arrows were pointing to a book with possibility.
Think instead of Boy meets Girl, Girl happens to be married to kindly older man, Boy and Girl fall into instant lust, Girl horribly betrays kindly husband, Boy behaves foolishly in every manner possible and on and on until we have a 17th century soap opera in full bloom (haha). Tulips do figure in, but just enough to set the stage for lunacy, deceit and,finally, ruin. Surprisingly, the kindly old man benefits in the end and not from tulips, but from unexpected liberation of heart and spirit.
Anyway, this is a frivolous and silly read. Not even good beach material. (Nearly 3.5) If you liked Girl with a Pearl Earring and, you may also enjoy this atmospheric, art-inspired novel set in the 1630s.
(Originally from 1999, it’s recently been adapted into a film.) Sophia, married off to an old merchant, falls in love with Jan van Loos, the painter who comes to do their portrait. If Sophia and Jan are ever to be together, they’ll have to scrape together enough money to plot an elaborate escape.
I thought this was rather soap opera-ish most of the (Nearly 3.5) If you liked Girl with a Pearl Earring and, you may also enjoy this atmospheric, art-inspired novel set in the 1630s. (Originally from 1999, it’s recently been adapted into a film.) Sophia, married off to an old merchant, falls in love with Jan van Loos, the painter who comes to do their portrait. If Sophia and Jan are ever to be together, they’ll have to scrape together enough money to plot an elaborate escape.
I thought this was rather soap opera-ish most of the way through, though I was satisfied with how things turned out in the end. The short chapters split between different perspectives (with Sophia’s the only first-person voice) make this a quick read.Favorite lines:“I see us as a painting. Cornelis, his white lace collar against black, his beard moving as he eats.
The herring lying on my plate, its glistening, scored skin split open to reveal the flesh within; the parted lips of my roll. Grapes, plump and opaque in the candle-light; the pewter goblet glowing dully.”“There is a purity about our love of flowers; it is an act of homage, untempered by greed. Tulips are the exception to his; when I think of them lust rises within me, a shameful wave of heat.”. The tulip speculation bubble is only an aside in what is basically a 17th century soap opera. The time period offered so much potential, not just the tulip bulbs, but also an age of great Dutch artists, unfortunately none of it is explored in any substantive way.
In retrospect, save 2 chapters (one about a bulb grower and one about Jan's bulb trading, this novel could be transposed to almost any place/time.Perhaps the best thing I can say is that it reads quickly with its short chapters. The The tulip speculation bubble is only an aside in what is basically a 17th century soap opera. The time period offered so much potential, not just the tulip bulbs, but also an age of great Dutch artists, unfortunately none of it is explored in any substantive way. In retrospect, save 2 chapters (one about a bulb grower and one about Jan's bulb trading, this novel could be transposed to almost any place/time.Perhaps the best thing I can say is that it reads quickly with its short chapters. The worst thing I can say is that all the characters are so incredibly obtuse it is a wonder the even survived to adulthood.
From a servant who cannot complete a task - to anyone in 1600s Amsterdam who cannot recognize a bulb - to anyone who would mistake a bulb for an onion - to numerous folks who make major life decisions based on assumption without verification - this novel stretches the limits of credulity at every turn.Not a waste of time, but a big dsappointment. Perhaps a good airplane or beach read - quick, light, easily disposable when done. Having just finished, I figured I'd stay in 17th century Holland just a little longer with this book. And really, I have to say that was a great decision.Many of the reviewers have said that they feel as this is just a soap opera from the 17th century set down on paper, and they're not wrong. But what makes this book isn't so much the plot, though that is fast-paced enough to keep it interesting, it's the writing. While I suppose I would characterize this as a Having just finished, I figured I'd stay in 17th century Holland just a little longer with this book. And really, I have to say that was a great decision.Many of the reviewers have said that they feel as this is just a soap opera from the 17th century set down on paper, and they're not wrong.
But what makes this book isn't so much the plot, though that is fast-paced enough to keep it interesting, it's the writing. While I suppose I would characterize this as a great beach read or an airplane novel, a book you can leave behind at your destination without guilt, what sets it apart is its writing. Most of the other fluff novels I have read have suffered in the writing, with characters that are more caricatures than real people. This read like a novel full of real people in the flesh, choosing some really awful and foolish paths to travel, but then sometimes we all make really foolish decisions.About my only real criticism of this book is that I don't really understand how Sophia and Jan van Loos fall so quickly in love - or was it merely lust on her part? Having so little experience with men, since she married rich old Cornelis at such a young age, I'm not sure she did love Jan so very truly.While it's true that the tulipomania that seized Holland during these years is but a mere plot point (though it's mind-boggling that one bulb could truly be worth so very much money), it serves as a poignant metaphor for the torrid passion that takes hold of both Jan and Sophia, one that can only result in ruin, as it did for many of Holland's businessmen. Oh dear, what a disappointing read!Tulip Fever tells the tale of Sophia, a young woman in 17th century Amsterdam, married to a much older man.
Sophia’s wealthy husband, Cornelis, commissions a young painter, Jan, to paint a portrait of him and his wife. Sophia and Jan develop an intense attraction, which leads to a torrid affair.Unfortunately, I did not enjoy Tulip Fever. The plot synopsis promised excitement but I found it rather dull. It is a book of less than 300 pages, yet it took me two Oh dear, what a disappointing read!Tulip Fever tells the tale of Sophia, a young woman in 17th century Amsterdam, married to a much older man. Sophia’s wealthy husband, Cornelis, commissions a young painter, Jan, to paint a portrait of him and his wife. Sophia and Jan develop an intense attraction, which leads to a torrid affair.Unfortunately, I did not enjoy Tulip Fever. The plot synopsis promised excitement but I found it rather dull.
It is a book of less than 300 pages, yet it took me two weeks to read! I did not connect with Sophia and Jan’s relationship, as the author does not explore the attraction between them in any detail. Within a few pages, they are embroiled in a passionate affair, which appears to develop out of very little. The lack of substance behind their relationship left me unsympathetic to their affair and worse, I began to dislike them as characters.The deceptive plan Sophia and Jan concoct in order to be together was so ludicrous, I almost laughed. It was quite clearly doomed to fail because it was so completely implausible. I found my sympathy directed toward Sophia’s oblivious husband, who genuinely loves his wife, and her beleaguered maid, Maria who has been caught in Sophia and Jan’s web of deceit.I think the author should have taken more time to expand on the early stages of Sophia and Jan’s relationship.
This would have helped to make the reader more sympathetic to their affair and like them better as characters. This novel had great potential but lack of detail and unlikeable protagonists made it a forgettable read. This book was voluptuous historical fiction without anyone's bodice actually getting ripped off.
(There's sex and love in the book - just no actual bodice-ripping or silly over-the-top romance.)Moggach paints a convincing and resonant portrait of a world poised between religion and secularism, tradition and trade, city and globe. Her appreciation for Rembrandt, Vermeer, and other painters of their ilk infuses her physical descriptions as well as her verbal renderings of visual art. Like the This book was voluptuous historical fiction without anyone's bodice actually getting ripped off. (There's sex and love in the book - just no actual bodice-ripping or silly over-the-top romance.)Moggach paints a convincing and resonant portrait of a world poised between religion and secularism, tradition and trade, city and globe. Her appreciation for Rembrandt, Vermeer, and other painters of their ilk infuses her physical descriptions as well as her verbal renderings of visual art.
Like the Dutch still lives and portraits from the 17th century (the time period of this book), Moggach's novel delves into the relationship between body, sex, mortality, spirit, and art. The voluptuousness (that word again!) of the flesh only draws attention to the transitory nature of love and life-which makes its pleasures even more keen. And this book is a catalog of those pleasures and intensities of the body; Moggach delves into eating, drinking, screwing, childbearing, nursing.
Her diction and imagery are sensual and aestheticized even as her style is spare and lyrical-a combination of fecundity and grace that corresponds with the painting style she is trying to evoke.The plot is engrossing and perfectly paced. You constantly have a sense of impending doom. The snippets from various characters' points of view convey not only the psychology and perspectives of these players but also glimpses of the larger plot to which their actions contribute, even as the authors of these actions have limited control over their consequences. I also really appreciate Moggach's attention to female characters' desire for control over their lives, their circumscribed agency and mobility, and finally the way that patriarchal and religious ideologies shape their view of themselves.An absolutely pleasurable read.
I liked this much better than I thought I would. A fast, entertaining read, with writing that is pared down, but really very good.Amsterdam in 1632 is a prosperous city of merchants who rule the known world, at least in terms of commerce. Cornelius, a well-to-do merchant in late middle-age, has married the young and beautiful Sophia. He is a good, kind man and Sophia appreciates having been rescued from poverty when her family’s fortunes declined. The Netherlands is in the midst of a financial I liked this much better than I thought I would. A fast, entertaining read, with writing that is pared down, but really very good.Amsterdam in 1632 is a prosperous city of merchants who rule the known world, at least in terms of commerce.
Cornelius, a well-to-do merchant in late middle-age, has married the young and beautiful Sophia. He is a good, kind man and Sophia appreciates having been rescued from poverty when her family’s fortunes declined. The Netherlands is in the midst of a financial bubble as people from every walk of life speculate crazily on tulip bulbs, a mania that blossomed wildly for a while before the inevitable crash that ruined many.Sophia is content, but then she meets Jan van Loos when he comes to paint their portraits and. It’s an old story: love triangle between an old husband, young wife, and a young man without means. But there are some twists to the plot that I did not see coming. There’s a ruse involving a pregnant servant about to be homeless and disgraced, and a scheme dependent on a tulip bulb worth a workingman’s annual wage. What happens with the bulb is not what you'd think.Short chapters alternate between the viewpoints of the several main characters.MariaMaria the maid, dozy with love, polishes the copper warming pan.
She is heavy with desire; she feels sluggish, as if she is moving around underwater. Her face, distorted by the curved metal, smiles back at herself.
She is a big, ruddy country girl with a healthy appetite. Her conscience, too, is a healthily adaptable organ. When she takes Willem into her bed, deep in the wall behind the kitchen fire, she pulls the curtain to shut out God’s disapproval.
Out of sight, out of mind.SophiaBehind his easel the painter is watching me. His blue eyes bore into my soul. He is a small, wiry man with wild black hair.
His head is cocked to one side. I stare back at him coolly. Then I realize—he is not looking at me. He is looking at an arrangement to be painted. He wipes his brush on a rag and frowns. I am just an object—brown hair, white lace collar and blue, shot-silk dress.JanBack in his studio, Jan sits down heavily on a chair. He gazes at a chicken bone, lying on the floor among a scattering of walnut shells.
He cannot remember when he dropped them; the bone, with its tattered flesh, is gray with dust. Jan sits there, thinking about love.
He has had many women—foolish virgins, foolish wives. For a man who devotes his life to beauty he hasn’t been fussy. There’s no such thing as an ugly woman, just not enough brandy.A simple writing style, but vivid, putting me right there in 17th century Amsterdam. I could feel the dampness of the fog off the canals, smell the fish in the marketplace. And I understood the passion of the young lovers as they become more and more reckless in their pursuit of happiness together.This story gave me a craving to go to the museum to see some Dutch still lifes and portraits, which I did when I finished this book. You probably won’t find a person who doesn’t know Kochenhof and the endless tulip fields in Holland.
Today this is the country with biggest tulip production in the world. Every spring we can enjoy The Tulip Fest in Amsterdam where we can see different tulip cultivars selected there. This period in their history, to which the author take us, is extremely interesting for me in a professional way and also as a flowers lover.I began reading this book with an intention to learn something new about You probably won’t find a person who doesn’t know Kochenhof and the endless tulip fields in Holland. Today this is the country with biggest tulip production in the world. Every spring we can enjoy The Tulip Fest in Amsterdam where we can see different tulip cultivars selected there.
This period in their history, to which the author take us, is extremely interesting for me in a professional way and also as a flowers lover.I began reading this book with an intention to learn something new about the story of this beautiful flowers. No matter how much I’ve read about them and the Tulip Fever, nothing can compare with author’s research, especially when this is part from your own history. But actually tulips have been introduced in Holland from Turkey in late XVI century and the viral disease, that caused this versicoloured flowers, is one of the first plant viruses that had been described.The author takes us to the home of Sophia and Cornelis. He is a rich merchant. Her father is used to be very rich, but he went bankrupt and this forced Sophia to marry a rich so he can pay for her father debts. After the death of Cornelis wife and two sons, Sophia is the answer to his prayers for family. Sophia is resigned to her fate and to life with way too older man then her, until the day Jan crossed the threshold of their house.
Denga Groznica
Jan van Loos is young, talented artist who is supposed to immortalise the image of the couple for their inheritors. But from the very first moment Jan fell in love with the young girl and she (of course) shares his feelings.In the second story line we meet Maria - Sophia’s handmade and Willem - a street vendor, selling fishes. Although their strong feelings they can’t get married because they don’t have enough money. A big misunderstanding, caused by Sophia, separated them for a while. Despite the fact that they are not the main characters, their story is more touching and true than Sophia and Jan’s.We don’t learn much about the tulips. Nothing interesting at all.
Some statistics and cultivars’ true names- nothing new. I really wanted to learn something more about Tulip Fever. What made people to stake their own houses for just one bulb. What made the price of a single bulb that high. The story, itself, has a lot of potential, but it is undeveloped. Everything happens so quickly, ridiculously quick. How fast Sophia jumps into Jan’s bed without doubts.
How Jan became one of the biggest bulb retailers - it does happen amazingly fast and without much of explanation. The storyline is senseless. The book sounds like something written in a rush, with deadlines coming faster than expected.I can’t feel it like a proper tragedy that this book is supposed to be. Far from touching and heartbreaking. I read Tulip Fever in almost one sitting on the flight to Dubai from Amsterdam, where I now live.
It was recommended to me by my favourite fellow reader - my mother - because of the setting of Amsterdam in the first half of the seventeenth century, its focus on the fast-growing trend of portrait painting and the rise and fall of Tulipmania on the stock market, something I knew little about.I found the historical references, descriptions, facts and details fascinating and I wildly appreciate all I read Tulip Fever in almost one sitting on the flight to Dubai from Amsterdam, where I now live. It was recommended to me by my favourite fellow reader - my mother - because of the setting of Amsterdam in the first half of the seventeenth century, its focus on the fast-growing trend of portrait painting and the rise and fall of Tulipmania on the stock market, something I knew little about.I found the historical references, descriptions, facts and details fascinating and I wildly appreciate all the author's hard work to research, collate and squeeze as much data in her flowing text without interrupting the natural progression of the story. This book is the ultimate companion for anyone who visits Amsterdam and plans on spending all their time in the Rijksmuseum (which is easily done - it's a huge museum).I also enjoyed how quickly the story began and how promptly the reader is thrown into a web of lies, scandal and lust all told in very beautiful prose. Plot twists kept me turning the pages and there was a wonderful crescendo of tension was almost as comical as it was angst-ridden - kudos to Moggach!Historical fiction is not my cup of tea at all, but the history lessons I learned about a place I loved and a Dutch institution - tulips - left me feeling satisfied as much with my new knowledge as I was with the charmingly told story of full-of-life characters in old Amsterdam. Despite liking the paintings and enjoying every other book of Moggach's that I've read (and so coming to this optimistically) this left me cold. I liked Cornelis, Maria and Willem, but Sophia and Jan left me at first bemused and then rather repelled. Their love story came out of nowhere; there was no insight into their motivations and their love affair felt sleazy - which is odd because the love between Willem and Maria felt real indeed.
A few plots twists in the end made it feel like a morality Despite liking the paintings and enjoying every other book of Moggach's that I've read (and so coming to this optimistically) this left me cold. I liked Cornelis, Maria and Willem, but Sophia and Jan left me at first bemused and then rather repelled.
Their love story came out of nowhere; there was no insight into their motivations and their love affair felt sleazy - which is odd because the love between Willem and Maria felt real indeed. A few plots twists in the end made it feel like a morality play of sorts.
No recommended even if you like Dutch painters. What a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.' Sir Walter ScottDeborah Moggach used the life of a real painter from Holland in the 1600's to tell a story of passions built on deceit. The deceit begins with a mistaken identity, causes collusion between a servant woman and her mistress, and uses the burgeoning tulip markets to build worth that only exists on paper.
As the plot becomes more and more complicated the web of deceit winds tighter. I flew through the last few 'Oh! What a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.' Sir Walter ScottDeborah Moggach used the life of a real painter from Holland in the 1600's to tell a story of passions built on deceit. The deceit begins with a mistaken identity, causes collusion between a servant woman and her mistress, and uses the burgeoning tulip markets to build worth that only exists on paper.
As the plot becomes more and more complicated the web of deceit winds tighter. I flew through the last few chapters to discover the fate of the characters involved.Sophia, a young beautiful wife and her aging husband, Cornelis, plan to have a painting done by an up-and-coming artist, Jan van Loos. Upon meeting, Sophia and van Loos form an instant attraction that leads to an illicit affair.
Tulip Fever Netflix
Sophia concocts a spectacularly complicated hoax to leave her husband that I kept dreading would backfire. The interesting conclusion to this trickery forms a superb moral tale with interesting symbolism.I am interested to see the movie and compare them. I wonder how closely Steven Spielberg will follow the plot line and I'm curious to see who plays the characters. Holland of 1600's should play remarkably well under Spielberg's direction.
This is not your usual historical fiction book.It takes place in the Netherlands in the 17th century when the inflated speculation in tulip bulbs is in full bloom. The book, however, is not particularly about the events of ‘Tulip Fever’.This simple drama does scatter in historical events and social behaviors of the time. 'Tulip Fever' does work its way into the story. Yet it is primarily a drama about the lives of several characters. Each separate chapter presents a perspective by the variety This is not your usual historical fiction book.It takes place in the Netherlands in the 17th century when the inflated speculation in tulip bulbs is in full bloom. The book, however, is not particularly about the events of ‘Tulip Fever’.This simple drama does scatter in historical events and social behaviors of the time. 'Tulip Fever' does work its way into the story.
Yet it is primarily a drama about the lives of several characters. Each separate chapter presents a perspective by the variety of individual characters: A wealthy widower, his young wife, the wife’s maid, the maid’s betrothed, the tulip grower, and a portrait painter, and his several associates.I would term this book an ‘understated melodrama’. The book has an entertaining contrast between its predictable plot and the implausible activities the story discloses.It is a fast read as it compels you to continue into the story. I found it amusing and entertaining. As the drama progresses towards conclusion, the surprise twist of events is improbable and comical. It left me with a long lingering giggle.I am curious to see how the movie version has been developed in comparison to this book. This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers.
Tulipanska Groznica 2017 Schedule
To view it,While this book was thrilling enough to keep me enticed and wanting to read more it didn't appeal to me as a re-read. All in all the overly exaggerated states of love experienced by the characters didn't sit well with me because, who in the heck falls in love, cheats on their husband, fakes their death and then commits suicide only after taking one look at their lover and deciding that he's your one and true love.Yet, considering this, I could not help but fall in love with the nature of the While this book was thrilling enough to keep me enticed and wanting to read more it didn't appeal to me as a re-read. All in all the overly exaggerated states of love experienced by the characters didn't sit well with me because, who in the heck falls in love, cheats on their husband, fakes their death and then commits suicide only after taking one look at their lover and deciding that he's your one and true love.Yet, considering this, I could not help but fall in love with the nature of the tulips and the madness they brought amongst the people of Amsterdam. Also, Jan captures beauty in a way no other painter does and it is the representation of the still life depicted on a canvas that really captured my attention.Overall, Deborah Moggach did a great job reflecting the personalities and romantics of the 17th century and was spectacular at showing how the society functioned in a different way while showing their modest appearance but also the unrestricted nature of their love. Tulip Fever is a fictionised story of Seventeenth century Amsterdam where Jan Van Loos (who may be loosely based on Jacob Van Loos, an actual painter) is doing a portrait of a successful merchant and his much younger, second wife.
The artist and the wife fall in love.The author does well at bringing the era to life, (including the obsession with tulips and the fortunes associated with them) and using art descriptively. Her love of Amsterdam and the Dutch masters comes to the reader through the Tulip Fever is a fictionised story of Seventeenth century Amsterdam where Jan Van Loos (who may be loosely based on Jacob Van Loos, an actual painter) is doing a portrait of a successful merchant and his much younger, second wife. The artist and the wife fall in love.The author does well at bringing the era to life, (including the obsession with tulips and the fortunes associated with them) and using art descriptively. Her love of Amsterdam and the Dutch masters comes to the reader through the writing, the words paint pictures of scenes in such a way that one feels that one is looking at a master painting. This ability to write 'artistically' is worth a whole star in my book, and was the best part of the novel.
The nice plate reproductions of golden age Dutch masters to illustrate the time, place and lifestyle are also good, though I am mystified as to why there is not a single Jan Van Loos among them.Despite all the good things going for it I remained ambivalent about this book while reading it. The short chapters I especially found jarring because, seriously! Two pages is NOT a chapter. Part of the reason for the two page 'chapters' was the shifting points of view, the five main characters (there were not really any secondary characters) are addressed one at a time and I was not at all a fan of that either. So regarding the characters, they were never anything but one dimensional, stereotypical even, and with the jarring, shifting points of view it was impossible to feel much for them. Sophia gets to be first person some of the time but not all of the time, the others are never first person. All these factors made it slow and cumbersome to read.The scenarios got more and more absurd, unlikely, unconvincing and contrived as the novel progressed.
The romance between Jan and Sophia was not unlikely, though I could not find any empathy for it, but it got more and more over the top. Willem started off as a likely, interesting character but really does anyone ever do anything that daft? Then the pregnancy plot. Idiotic, unlikely, unlikable and wholly unconvincing. Ultimately, the convoluted, poorly thought out and highly unbelievable scenarios were what made me want to stop reading.
If I had a connection to the characters I might have persevered, but it just became a Monty Pythonesc farce which still appeared to be taking itself way too seriously to be an enjoyable read.So, basically, I quit at page 111 and I am not proud of ditching the book, I did get a lot of enjoyment and information about artwork from it so it was not a failure as such. However, as the plot got more convoluted and florid I found myself reluctant to pick up the book and keep reading. I love reading, so finding excuses not to is pretty damning. For a while I tried skim reading ahead to see how things worked out, but really, those woeful characters, I could not care about them and I have no interest at all in how things turned out for them. Because this novel is plot led, it is easy to get the story simply by reading three words on every page.
There are no distinguishing features between Sophia, the lady of the house, and Maria, her maid. Nor could I discern any difference between the male characters; one is 65, the other is a dark-haired,short, chubby artist, and the third is an artisan. Twice in the novel, crucial money purses are lost through chicanery, a repeat that suggests no other way could be found to twist the unbelievable Because this novel is plot led, it is easy to get the story simply by reading three words on every page. There are no distinguishing features between Sophia, the lady of the house, and Maria, her maid. Nor could I discern any difference between the male characters; one is 65, the other is a dark-haired,short, chubby artist, and the third is an artisan. Twice in the novel, crucial money purses are lost through chicanery, a repeat that suggests no other way could be found to twist the unbelievable turn of events when Sophia pretends to be pregnant and then fakes her death in childbirth and the maid who is really pregnant presents the baby to Sophia's husband as his own. The artist who is having an affair wIth Sophia makes a fortune on futures markets of tulips and then loses it, and so on and so on.
I read it for my book group. Deborah Moggach is a British writer, born Deborah Hough on 28 June 1948. She has written fifteen novels to date, including The Ex-Wives, Tulip Fever, and, most recently, These Foolish Things. She has adapted many of her novels as TV dramas and has also written several film scripts, including the BAFTA-nominated screenplay for Pride & Prejudice. She has also written two collections of short Deborah Moggach is a British writer, born Deborah Hough on 28 June 1948. She has written fifteen novels to date, including The Ex-Wives, Tulip Fever, and, most recently, These Foolish Things. She has adapted many of her novels as TV dramas and has also written several film scripts, including the BAFTA-nominated screenplay for Pride & Prejudice.
She has also written two collections of short stories and a stage play. In February 2005, Moggach was awarded an honorary Doctor of Letters degree by her Alma Mater, the University of Bristol. She is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature, a former Chair of the Society of Authors, and is on the executive committee of PEN.